Once again, the Supreme Court on Friday refused the Tamil Nadu government's request seeking quick listing of its application in the Cauvery case to restrain Karnataka from resorting to summer irrigation or drawing water from the four main reservoirs, Krishnarajasagar, Kabini, Hemavathy and Harangi during summer. The court will take up the case in July after the summer vacation.
The bench of Justices D.K. Jain and Anil R. Dave B told senior counsel for Tamil Nadu C.S. Vaidyanathan, when he pleaded for urgent hearing of the matter that it would not be possible for the court to take up the case before July.
Justice Jain told Mr. Vaidyanathan that it would be taken up in July after the summer vacation. The application stated that on March 15, the storage in the four reservoirs had depleted and only about 20 to 30 tmcft would remain by the end of May, as against the full storage of 114.5 tmcft.
Karnataka depletes the storage from February to May for building up its storage from June to September. By that act, Tamil Nadu could not meet its irrigation requirement from June to September because of shortfall in inflow. So, TN wishes the court to pass a restraint order against Karnataka.
Counsel Mohan Katarki, appearing for Karnataka, said the only obligation arising from the final order of the Tribunal, was to make available 192 tmc ft of water at Biligundlu in a normal year.
Disputing TN's stand he said: “The flows measured by the Central Water Commission at the inter-state border Biligundlu indicate that during the water years of 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11, the flows were 353 tmcft, 210 tmcft, 219 tmcft and 209 tmcft respectively. In the water year 2011-12, about 227 tmcft has been recorded as against 192 tmcft ordered by the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal by its Final Order dated February 5, 2007 in a normal year.”
Tamil Nadu also filed another application seeking a direction against the Union of India for publication of the award of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal dated February 5, 2007 under Sec.6(1) of the Inter State River Water Disputes Act, 1956. The Bench said both the applications would be heard in July. (msn)
